lc1978
08-16 07:52 PM
Hello Gurus,
Pl guide me and let me know my options for the below scenario...
1. Me: Applied under EB2 (India) and have I-140 approved in September 2006.
Status as of now : Applied as dependent (secondary) on my spouse 485 and have EAD and AP since July 2007.
2. My spouse : Primary applicant - EB3 (India), December 2003.
As the dates are NOT moving forward for EB3 (India), I want to port our GC application dates from my spouse priority ( EB3- India - December 2003) to mine (EB2 - India - September 2006)
My question is, Can I change my status from dependent (secondary ) on my spouse 485 to me being primary applicant by invoking my approved I-140 (EB2 - India - September 2006), If YES what would be the process.
Thanks in advance
Pl guide me and let me know my options for the below scenario...
1. Me: Applied under EB2 (India) and have I-140 approved in September 2006.
Status as of now : Applied as dependent (secondary) on my spouse 485 and have EAD and AP since July 2007.
2. My spouse : Primary applicant - EB3 (India), December 2003.
As the dates are NOT moving forward for EB3 (India), I want to port our GC application dates from my spouse priority ( EB3- India - December 2003) to mine (EB2 - India - September 2006)
My question is, Can I change my status from dependent (secondary ) on my spouse 485 to me being primary applicant by invoking my approved I-140 (EB2 - India - September 2006), If YES what would be the process.
Thanks in advance
wallpaper The Quintessential Pretty
k3GC
04-18 10:43 PM
We have applied for our 485 under EB2 I with a PD of Jun 2005 (I am primary and my wife is the dependent). We have maintained our H1B status though have used AP for travel.
Its time to renew my wifes H1B within the next few weeks. With all the talk of spillover and a remote chance that may be our 485 gets approved during the last quarter, i wanted to know if there would be any problem if our GC got approved while the H1B remained pending or worse the H1B got approved too around the same time the GC got approved. [i am hearing that it is taking a few months for H1 approval]
Is there an process that we need to follow - withdraw the H1B once we know that the GC got approved etc.
Also is there any problem with H1B renewal if AP has been used?
Any help wrt both these topics is appreciated.
Its time to renew my wifes H1B within the next few weeks. With all the talk of spillover and a remote chance that may be our 485 gets approved during the last quarter, i wanted to know if there would be any problem if our GC got approved while the H1B remained pending or worse the H1B got approved too around the same time the GC got approved. [i am hearing that it is taking a few months for H1 approval]
Is there an process that we need to follow - withdraw the H1B once we know that the GC got approved etc.
Also is there any problem with H1B renewal if AP has been used?
Any help wrt both these topics is appreciated.
archanadhar19
10-12 03:07 PM
Perm applied in May 2007 . Got audit in June . Responded within a week. No response since then. Company lawyer approached DOL 3 times checking for the labor status. No response.
Is it possible to resubmit the perm application retaining old date. Any suggestion if that might help.
Is it possible to resubmit the perm application retaining old date. Any suggestion if that might help.
2011 Hating Julia Roberts
rkumar28
09-24 06:12 PM
To Experts and Attorneys,
I have a question regarding AC21 portibility. I got my EAD in Oct 12th 2007. In the labor(used a pre-approved labor), the base pay mentioned is 48K and I was getting paid 55K from my current employer(A) who filed my green card.
I am getting another job in company (B) in the same field. The salary offer is better but is very high than mentioned in my labor. The new salary is around 85K.
1) Will the high salary will cause any issue with green card process if I take AC21 and use my EAD. Anyone had this kind of experience with the salary difference.
2) How do I know my new job is in the same or similar category as defined by USCIS.
3) Is AC21 is safe to take.
Thanks.....
I have a question regarding AC21 portibility. I got my EAD in Oct 12th 2007. In the labor(used a pre-approved labor), the base pay mentioned is 48K and I was getting paid 55K from my current employer(A) who filed my green card.
I am getting another job in company (B) in the same field. The salary offer is better but is very high than mentioned in my labor. The new salary is around 85K.
1) Will the high salary will cause any issue with green card process if I take AC21 and use my EAD. Anyone had this kind of experience with the salary difference.
2) How do I know my new job is in the same or similar category as defined by USCIS.
3) Is AC21 is safe to take.
Thanks.....
more...
blacklizard
05-29 12:36 AM
What is Image Croping? U need to understand that! The area which you will select will give you the x y co-ordinates which should be fed into the LockBit method this method will retutn a pointer. Yes the code will be unsafe but it will work i did it. Now Use the scan0 property then increment the pointer [0] for green [1] for blue [2] red and copy to any another file which will become your new croped image. I can provide you the source code snippet but why dont u try for urself first thats how people lear not by spoon feeding. Try a bit googling with search string as Simple Dialation Using C#. Have fun i had too.
Zee
04-26 05:58 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/25/bush.immigration/index.html
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush met Tuesday at the White House with a bipartisan group of senators to discuss ways to overhaul immigration, a chat that earned the president kudos from two men normally among his staunchest critics.
"It is important that we reform a system that is not working. It's important that we uphold the values of the United States of America. It's important that we treat people with dignity," the president said. "I strongly believe that we have a chance to get an immigration bill that is comprehensive in nature to my desk before the end of this year."
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush met Tuesday at the White House with a bipartisan group of senators to discuss ways to overhaul immigration, a chat that earned the president kudos from two men normally among his staunchest critics.
"It is important that we reform a system that is not working. It's important that we uphold the values of the United States of America. It's important that we treat people with dignity," the president said. "I strongly believe that we have a chance to get an immigration bill that is comprehensive in nature to my desk before the end of this year."
more...
kirupa
03-27 01:30 AM
chrs - please break your entry into three separate threads instead of lumping multiple entries into one.
Thanks,
Kirupa
Thanks,
Kirupa
2010 Pretty Woman and mother of
NANO3
11-10 10:00 PM
pixel fonts are not meant to be used over the size of 8pt
font is fuzzy, background is too much
sorry, but i don't really like it
font is fuzzy, background is too much
sorry, but i don't really like it
more...
muni_k
09-14 10:33 AM
I have a PD of September 2007 in the EB-2 category. I am currently on an H1B 3 year extension(after 6 years) on basis of an approved I-140.I am a physician and would like to pursue a fellowship given that it is unclear how many years I will have to wait to get a green card. Can I extend the H1B (change employer),given that I got the 3 year extension of the H1b on the basis of an approved I-140? What are the consequences for the H1B visa (employer change).I know I may have to start my green card process all over again.Thank you.
hair Well Julia Roberts is
Macaca
04-05 08:23 AM
Some paras from Where There's a Cause, There's a Caucus (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/04/AR2007040402757.html), By Zachary A. Goldfarb, Special to The Washington Post, Thursday, April 5, 2007
Every morning in Washington, Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) rides his rusty red-orange Trek bicycle to work on Capitol Hill, a reminder of one of the first things he did when he came to Congress in 1996: create a bike caucus.
With 165 members, the bipartisan Congressional Bike Caucus promotes the use of bicycles as a substitute for cars -- a way to exercise, reduce fossil fuel emissions and improve travel patterns. The caucus shepherded $4 billion for trails, bike paths and pedestrian facilities in a big transportation spending bill in the last Congress.
The bike caucus is just one of the zany-sounding groups that lawmakers have created on Capitol Hill to advance niche interests in Congress. There's no trick to creating a caucus -- or "congressional member organization" -- in the House, where it takes just a letter to the Administration Committee. Nearly 300 have registered. The Senate has far fewer groups, and they don't register at all.
But some caucuses have come to play prominent roles on the front lines of Capitol Hill. The Republican Study Committee has worked to amplify the views of the more conservative wing of the GOP. Since Democrats took control of Congress in January, the Congressional Black Caucus has wielded unusual power, with five members serving as chairmen of House committees.
Every morning in Washington, Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) rides his rusty red-orange Trek bicycle to work on Capitol Hill, a reminder of one of the first things he did when he came to Congress in 1996: create a bike caucus.
With 165 members, the bipartisan Congressional Bike Caucus promotes the use of bicycles as a substitute for cars -- a way to exercise, reduce fossil fuel emissions and improve travel patterns. The caucus shepherded $4 billion for trails, bike paths and pedestrian facilities in a big transportation spending bill in the last Congress.
The bike caucus is just one of the zany-sounding groups that lawmakers have created on Capitol Hill to advance niche interests in Congress. There's no trick to creating a caucus -- or "congressional member organization" -- in the House, where it takes just a letter to the Administration Committee. Nearly 300 have registered. The Senate has far fewer groups, and they don't register at all.
But some caucuses have come to play prominent roles on the front lines of Capitol Hill. The Republican Study Committee has worked to amplify the views of the more conservative wing of the GOP. Since Democrats took control of Congress in January, the Congressional Black Caucus has wielded unusual power, with five members serving as chairmen of House committees.
more...
chanduv23
11-20 10:20 AM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
hot Pretty Woman, Romantic Movie
desigirl
12-17 09:09 AM
Dec 16th The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Official Website | Current Events & Pop Culture, Comedy & Fake News (http://www.thedailyshow.com/)
Every Segment is a treasure!
Stewart Spends Last Show Of 2010 ENTIRELY On 9/11 First Responders Bill (VIDEO) (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/17/stewart-911-responders-bill_n_798114.html)
It is truly funny to have a comedy show asking the tough questions while the media plays it safe!
Every Segment is a treasure!
Stewart Spends Last Show Of 2010 ENTIRELY On 9/11 First Responders Bill (VIDEO) (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/17/stewart-911-responders-bill_n_798114.html)
It is truly funny to have a comedy show asking the tough questions while the media plays it safe!
more...
house julia roberts pretty woman
Blog Feeds
05-08 01:30 AM
Computerworld, which has been the media outlet of choice for the protectionist crowd, reports on one subject addressed by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano during her testimony this week. Napolitano told the Senate Judiciary Committee that USCIS is stepping up enforcement in the H-1B program. Anti-fraud measures being instituted include site visits. Some of the antis out there probably think that I have a problem with this. They would be wrong. Many of the anecdotes of bad behavior reported by critics of the H-1B program are quite unlawful under existing law.The vast majority of employers comply with the law and are...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/napolitano-uscis-to-focus-on-going-after-h1b-violators.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/napolitano-uscis-to-focus-on-going-after-h1b-violators.html)
tattoo Julia Roberts - The Pretty
Blog Feeds
05-22 01:10 PM
Today�s New York Times brims with immigration dysfunctions galore. The paper's immigration reports tellingly underscore the front-burner role this white-hot policy issue plays in the nation and the world. In the first section alone, we see: � An open-mike faux pas by British PM Gordon Brown, referring to an immigration opponent as a �bigoted woman,� prompted his abject apology and now risks a Labor Party loss in the UK election next week; � A controversial opinion piece and articles on the political, legal and economic fallout of the Arizona Peace-Officers� Suspect-and-Arrest-or-Refrain-and-Be-Sued Act; � A report on four Dream Act marchers�...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/all-the-immigration-news-thats-fit-to-print-1.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/all-the-immigration-news-thats-fit-to-print-1.html)
more...
pictures Julia Roberts: From Pretty
Mike K.T
08-12 04:58 PM
:lol: fun fun
dresses hair Julia Roberts - The
Blog Feeds
05-05 06:50 AM
Perry Bacon, Jr. writes in today's Washington Post that the President seems to be more interested in blaming the Republicans for his inability to deliver on immigration rather than actually making a serious effort to fix the problems. To President Obama - you've shown you're a serious bad @$S with your historic capture of the world's most wanted man. No one seriously believes you're helpless if you really consider something a priority.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/i-can-kill-bin-ladin-but-im-helpless-on-immigration.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/i-can-kill-bin-ladin-but-im-helpless-on-immigration.html)
more...
makeup Pretty Woman Julia Roberts has
Macaca
03-11 06:42 PM
Some paras from Securing Iraq Votes, One at a Time (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/10/AR2007031001300.html) -- House Democratic Leaders Methodically Build Support for War Plan
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
By Jonathan Weisman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Sunday, March 11, 2007
Rep. Jerry Nadler was the only lawmaker at a meeting of all House Democrats on Thursday to stand up and declare that he could not support a compromise plan to fund the Iraq war with a timeline to end the conflict. So some party leaders had written him off even as he joined House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a private meeting.
In the confines of the speaker's suite, Nadler (N.Y.) could be specific. He sought assurances from Pelosi (Calif.) that President Bush would be compelled to withdraw all troops from combat by August 2008, as the legislation proposed. He wanted to know: "What is the legal compulsion to follow this timeline?"
A Pelosi aide disappeared from the meeting for a few minutes and returned with a few lines of legislative text offering what Nadler wanted to hear: Once troops are out of Iraq, no money would be available to put them back in, outside the narrow exceptions of targeted counterterrorism operations, embassy protection and efforts to train Iraqis.
"You know," Nadler said after a pause, "I think that's okay."
Nadler's conversion was a sign of the member-by-member, slow but deliberate headway Democratic leaders say they are making in their efforts to cobble together the 218 supporters they need to pass one of the most consequential pieces of defense legislation in decades, a $105 billion war-funding bill that would impose strict standards of rest and readiness for the military, establish clear benchmarks for the government of Iraq and set a timeline to end U.S. involvement in the war.
Through closed-door meetings, pep rallies, private phone conversations and horse trading, Democratic leaders are moving outward from the 180 solid votes in the party's political center to win the votes on the party's left and right that will be needed to pass the bill later this month.
The cajoling will continue tomorrow as lawmakers return to Washington and the legislation is readied for markup later in the week. But there are roadblocks: Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.) said some conservatives are withholding their support until the language McDermott wanted is removed.
As Democratic leaders balance those demands, the calculus is fairly straightforward, said one conservative Democrat involved in the process. Leaders are counting on winning all but a dozen of the 43 conservative Blue Dog Democrats and all but a dozen of the 75 or so members of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus. Then, Democratic leaders are hoping, enough Republicans will break ranks to put them over the top.
By last week's end, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) said, they had secured about 200 votes.
But the last 18 votes will not be easy. That point was brought home Thursday morning, during the closed-door meeting in which the legislation was detailed for Democratic members. As Pelosi gave her pitch, Reps. Lynn Woolsey (Calif.), Barbara Lee (Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (Tex.) and Nadler stood up to leave for a news conference of their own. After an uncomfortable pause, Pelosi growled that she wished Democrats would be courteous enough to hear her out before talking to the media. Nadler sat down. The rest walked out.
Democratic aides concede that some party members, including Woolsey, Lee and Doggett, are all but lost. But they are not giving up.
"There's nothing guaranteed in life, but I feel very good," Emanuel said.
girlfriend From quot;Pretty Womanquot; to Fashion
loudobbs
08-29 12:23 PM
My attorneys screwed up and filed my I140 under the wrong category. (EB3 instead of EB2). They refiled PP but without the original Labor cert attached. My PP application is not approved yet.
I called a couple of weeks ago and they told me they wont do PP because the original labor cert was not attached.
I Emailed them yesterday and this is their reply:
'This petition has been assigned to an officer,but no decision has been made.'
Does this mean anything? meaning is it close to being approved??
Thanks much!!
I called a couple of weeks ago and they told me they wont do PP because the original labor cert was not attached.
I Emailed them yesterday and this is their reply:
'This petition has been assigned to an officer,but no decision has been made.'
Does this mean anything? meaning is it close to being approved??
Thanks much!!
hairstyles Julia Roberts - Pretty Woman
enigma006
11-30 11:07 AM
Hai..
F1 to H1..
My H1 is still pending..RFE on Oct 1st and employer replied..but staus is still same saying RFE sent..case on hold..
can I go for OPT Extension now as my current OPT dint end yet??
Do I need to work in this current OPT to be qualified for OPT Extension or is it sufficient if I have an offer from my employer and he is E-verified??
Looks like some of you got approval for OPT extension..so please help me by posting how you applied..
Let me know of legal stay during these times..
Please help me..
thanks...
F1 to H1..
My H1 is still pending..RFE on Oct 1st and employer replied..but staus is still same saying RFE sent..case on hold..
can I go for OPT Extension now as my current OPT dint end yet??
Do I need to work in this current OPT to be qualified for OPT Extension or is it sufficient if I have an offer from my employer and he is E-verified??
Looks like some of you got approval for OPT extension..so please help me by posting how you applied..
Let me know of legal stay during these times..
Please help me..
thanks...
Blog Feeds
04-11 03:40 PM
USCIS has released figures from the first week of the H-1B season and filings for the 65,000 H-1B "regular" cap slots for the fiscal year that begins in October were just 13,500. That is less than one third of the 42,000+ received during the same period last year and only about one-tenth of the number filed two years ago. Only 5,600 masters cap applications were filed against the 20,000 cap in that category.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/h1b-tally-for-first-week-just-onethird-of-last-years-numbers.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/h1b-tally-for-first-week-just-onethird-of-last-years-numbers.html)
sammyb
07-14 05:10 PM
Got a denial notice for my wife's AOS application (I-485) though dates are no where current for us ...
Got an RFE for both of us last month for immunization records etc which was replied on time ... The civil surgeon administered few shots and exempted her on few as she is nursing our newborn ... Now this week our lawyer received a notice of denial (not NOID) of her AOS application on the basis of the medical ... not sure what screwing USCIS is doing but I am pretty sure on one thing - they are running low on budget and need the MTR fees etc to collect additional fees ...
Does anyone else have same or similar kind of experience recently .... appreciate if you can share your experience ...
Got an RFE for both of us last month for immunization records etc which was replied on time ... The civil surgeon administered few shots and exempted her on few as she is nursing our newborn ... Now this week our lawyer received a notice of denial (not NOID) of her AOS application on the basis of the medical ... not sure what screwing USCIS is doing but I am pretty sure on one thing - they are running low on budget and need the MTR fees etc to collect additional fees ...
Does anyone else have same or similar kind of experience recently .... appreciate if you can share your experience ...
No comments:
Post a Comment