wandmaker
04-01 04:16 PM
You don't have to do anything.
wallpaper images Animal Cell 3d Model
Sudharani
06-28 12:45 AM
deleted.
Sudharani please update your profile and do not post such messages in future-- admin
Sudharani please update your profile and do not post such messages in future-- admin
Blog Feeds
01-18 05:10 AM
The Ranking Member of the House Immigration Subcommittee would like to deport all Haitians so they can help rebuild their country. Yeah, I'm sure that's what's motivating this "compassionate" proposal. Wonkette, the often hilarious DC gossip blog, has nicknamed King The #1 A@#hole in Congress for just this sort of rhetoric. ABC News quotes King: "This sounds to me like open borders advocates exercising the Rahm Emanuel axiom: 'Never let a crisis go to waste,'" Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said in an e-mail message to ABCNews. "Illegal immigrants from Haiti have no reason to fear deportation, but if they are...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/steve-king-wants-to-deport-haitians.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/steve-king-wants-to-deport-haitians.html)
2011 wallpaper 3d animal cell model
techbuyer77
06-17 08:04 PM
oh I see.... well lets wait for the best
more...
![Animal Cell Facts. [overhead-Animal cell]](http://users.humboldt.edu/rpaselk/BiochSupp/Cells/Euk_Biological_cell_5.png "[overhead-Animal cell]")
lascha
04-19 06:11 PM
I am in a similar position and also have my green card in process. havent yet given my step 3...dont know what to do?
I am hoping I can cancel my green card appli and start my resi on j1 visa
I am hoping I can cancel my green card appli and start my resi on j1 visa
Hermione
10-02 06:00 PM
Labor category has little to do with AC21. Your responsibilties should be 'similar', which is kind of a vague term, which means USCIS would generally not mess with anything that has enough of the same words used in description.
more...
virtual55
03-24 11:02 AM
I wrote an email to Mattew Oh to publish link of our webfax facility, I think we should contact immigration-law.com web site admin to make this happen
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=361
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=361
2010 hot cells and animal cells and
Blog Feeds
08-31 11:30 AM
A lot of nice tributes to Senator Kennedy recognizing his immigration achievements. Here are a few: Ted Kennedy's Greatest Accomplishment: He Created Americans - Dana Houle of Daily Kos talks about Kennedy's shepherding through the 1965 Immigration Act. From HIAS. From the National Immigration Forum. From the American Immigration Lawyers Association. From the Immigration Policy Center. From the Migration Policy Institute. Partha Banerjee in the McClatchy News Service And here is a speech Senator Kennedy gave in 2006 promoting his immigration reform bill:
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
more...
garugu
01-12 09:50 AM
Hi,
I am in 7th year of H1B which expires in Dec 2011. I-140 is approved. Applied for H1B extension in Oct2010 (after 6 yrs completed) based on approved I-140 but got extension for only 1 yr till 2011 (got client letter for 1 yr only) . Can i transfer my H1B to new Employer based on my approved I-140 from my current Employer? If so, can i get 3 yr extension with the new Employer or will the new H1B be valid only till 2011?
Thanks
I am in 7th year of H1B which expires in Dec 2011. I-140 is approved. Applied for H1B extension in Oct2010 (after 6 yrs completed) based on approved I-140 but got extension for only 1 yr till 2011 (got client letter for 1 yr only) . Can i transfer my H1B to new Employer based on my approved I-140 from my current Employer? If so, can i get 3 yr extension with the new Employer or will the new H1B be valid only till 2011?
Thanks
hair animal cell through microscope. animal cell microscope. animal
eb3_nepa
02-27 01:28 PM
I had emailed the Murthy team on Friday. Today Mr Vasant Nayak from Murthy.com emailed me back with concerns since i had emailed him from yahoo and my name was not in the list of volunteers. I have given him Admin and Walden Pond's names and have emailed both Admin and Walden Pond to touch base with him.
Murthy is a BIG source of traffic. He did say Murthy wud have to look a lot into us to put a link on their website. I request someone from the Board to pls get in touch with Mr Vasant Nayak. If you need his email pls send me a private message (as i dont want him getting spammed) ;)
Murthy is a BIG source of traffic. He did say Murthy wud have to look a lot into us to put a link on their website. I request someone from the Board to pls get in touch with Mr Vasant Nayak. If you need his email pls send me a private message (as i dont want him getting spammed) ;)
more...
goatlip
10-22 05:10 PM
I'm trying to figure out how to make a 3d vector animation of a person walking or dancing. more specifically, the outline of a person walking/dancing.
I've seen this before on other sites, but can't remember where. sometimes it's the 3d outline animation, sometimes its asingle-color 2d animation. does that make sense. I'll try to post an example if I find one.
Anyway, does anyone know this process or know of a place that shows how it's done? thanks.
I've seen this before on other sites, but can't remember where. sometimes it's the 3d outline animation, sometimes its asingle-color 2d animation. does that make sense. I'll try to post an example if I find one.
Anyway, does anyone know this process or know of a place that shows how it's done? thanks.
hot [overhead-Animal cell]
themagicflasher
07-10 07:36 PM
hahahaha....awesome!
I wish the one in his hand looked like it fit as good as the ones in the boat...but this is really really funny
I wish the one in his hand looked like it fit as good as the ones in the boat...but this is really really funny
more...
house animal-cell-diagram kids
Macaca
11-01 05:36 PM
Democrats Again Look to Change GOP Motions; After Defeats, Leaders Studying Ways to Neuter Republicans' Motions to Recommit (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_52/news/20763-1.html) By Jennifer Yachnin | ROLL CALL STAFF, October 31, 2007
Exasperated over Republicans' continued efforts - and occasional success - in thwarting the House floor schedule, Democratic leaders acknowledged Tuesday they are reviewing the chamber's rules to determine how to curb the minority's ability to put up roadblocks at critical moments in the legislative process.
House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D) said the committee's Democrats have begun meeting with both current and former Parliamentarians to discuss the chamber's rules and potential changes.
The New York lawmaker said those discussions have focused in part on the motion to recommit - one of the few procedural items in the minority party's toolbox that allows them to offer legislative alternatives when a bill hits the floor, and that Republicans have used to force difficult votes on Democrats or prompted legislation to be pulled from the floor - as well as other procedures, which she declined to detail.
Slaughter said no timeline exists for the review or potential alterations, however. "Nothing is imminent. We want to take our time and do it right," she said.
But one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said the majority is considering neutering the motion-to-recommit process and converting it to little more than a last-chance amendment for the minority party.
Under current House rules, the minority's motion can effectively shelve legislation through minor alterations to the language of their motion - specifically designating for a bill to be returned to its committee "promptly," rather than the usual "forthwith."
Republican leaders have used that strategy to force Democrats to either vote against measures they would otherwise support or vote to kill their own bill. Earlier this month, the GOP used that procedure to target a bill governing federal wiretapping and surveillance programs, prompting Democrats to scrub an expected vote.
Another Democratic lawmaker, who also is familiar with discussions and asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of those conversations, said that is only one option under consideration.
"We don't want to limit the minority's ability to have legitimate motions to recommit," the Democrat said.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) railed against Republicans' use of that particular tactic at his weekly press conference Tuesday, echoing complaints Democrats have raised off-and-on since March.
"The Republicans continue to use the motion to recommit for political purposes, not substantive purposes. Substantive purposes would be trying to change policy. For the most part, what they do with their motions to recommit are not change policy, but try to construct difficult political votes for Members," Hoyer said. "We understand that. To some degree, we did that as well. So it is not surprising."
While Hoyer acknowledged that Democrats had at times employed the same approach in the past, he criticized Republicans for using the method 22 times thus far in the 110th Congress, asserting that Democrats used the tactic only four times between 1995 and 1998.
"This is a game. It is a relatively cynical game," Hoyer added. "That doesn't mean it is not an effective game and causes questions. So we are trying to deal with that."
Democrats earlier had sought to alter the House rules on motions to recommit in May - an unusual step, given that the chamber's rules are rarely reopened mid-session - but Republicans rebelled on the House floor, and Democratic leaders agreed to forgo the changes, at least temporarily.
Democratic leaders suggested in August that they planned to offer legislation on the House floor aimed at dissuading Republicans from offering contentious procedural amendments tied to such hot-button issues as immigration. At the same time, Democrats hoped to provide insulation to their own Members with a separate vote on those topics, but have yet to produce any such resolutions.
Republicans have succeeded in winning 21 motions to recommit - the majority of which would not shelve the legislation they amend - in the past 10 months, a point that President Bush praised in a Tuesday meeting at the White House with Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), according to a GOP aide.
"Republicans and Democrats alike have lived under the very same germaneness rules since 1822, and changing them won't solve the majority's inherent inability to govern," Boehner spokesman Brian Kennedy said. "This isn't a question of rules, it's one of competence."
Exasperated over Republicans' continued efforts - and occasional success - in thwarting the House floor schedule, Democratic leaders acknowledged Tuesday they are reviewing the chamber's rules to determine how to curb the minority's ability to put up roadblocks at critical moments in the legislative process.
House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D) said the committee's Democrats have begun meeting with both current and former Parliamentarians to discuss the chamber's rules and potential changes.
The New York lawmaker said those discussions have focused in part on the motion to recommit - one of the few procedural items in the minority party's toolbox that allows them to offer legislative alternatives when a bill hits the floor, and that Republicans have used to force difficult votes on Democrats or prompted legislation to be pulled from the floor - as well as other procedures, which she declined to detail.
Slaughter said no timeline exists for the review or potential alterations, however. "Nothing is imminent. We want to take our time and do it right," she said.
But one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said the majority is considering neutering the motion-to-recommit process and converting it to little more than a last-chance amendment for the minority party.
Under current House rules, the minority's motion can effectively shelve legislation through minor alterations to the language of their motion - specifically designating for a bill to be returned to its committee "promptly," rather than the usual "forthwith."
Republican leaders have used that strategy to force Democrats to either vote against measures they would otherwise support or vote to kill their own bill. Earlier this month, the GOP used that procedure to target a bill governing federal wiretapping and surveillance programs, prompting Democrats to scrub an expected vote.
Another Democratic lawmaker, who also is familiar with discussions and asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of those conversations, said that is only one option under consideration.
"We don't want to limit the minority's ability to have legitimate motions to recommit," the Democrat said.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) railed against Republicans' use of that particular tactic at his weekly press conference Tuesday, echoing complaints Democrats have raised off-and-on since March.
"The Republicans continue to use the motion to recommit for political purposes, not substantive purposes. Substantive purposes would be trying to change policy. For the most part, what they do with their motions to recommit are not change policy, but try to construct difficult political votes for Members," Hoyer said. "We understand that. To some degree, we did that as well. So it is not surprising."
While Hoyer acknowledged that Democrats had at times employed the same approach in the past, he criticized Republicans for using the method 22 times thus far in the 110th Congress, asserting that Democrats used the tactic only four times between 1995 and 1998.
"This is a game. It is a relatively cynical game," Hoyer added. "That doesn't mean it is not an effective game and causes questions. So we are trying to deal with that."
Democrats earlier had sought to alter the House rules on motions to recommit in May - an unusual step, given that the chamber's rules are rarely reopened mid-session - but Republicans rebelled on the House floor, and Democratic leaders agreed to forgo the changes, at least temporarily.
Democratic leaders suggested in August that they planned to offer legislation on the House floor aimed at dissuading Republicans from offering contentious procedural amendments tied to such hot-button issues as immigration. At the same time, Democrats hoped to provide insulation to their own Members with a separate vote on those topics, but have yet to produce any such resolutions.
Republicans have succeeded in winning 21 motions to recommit - the majority of which would not shelve the legislation they amend - in the past 10 months, a point that President Bush praised in a Tuesday meeting at the White House with Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), according to a GOP aide.
"Republicans and Democrats alike have lived under the very same germaneness rules since 1822, and changing them won't solve the majority's inherent inability to govern," Boehner spokesman Brian Kennedy said. "This isn't a question of rules, it's one of competence."
tattoo animal cell diagram with
nmdial
06-22 12:51 PM
Dear All:
I am trying to add my wife (H-4 dependent) to my bank account. The bank (a credit union in PA) has asked me to fill in and submit a W-8BEN among other documents. Please shed some light on this. Your help is much appreciated.
I am trying to add my wife (H-4 dependent) to my bank account. The bank (a credit union in PA) has asked me to fill in and submit a W-8BEN among other documents. Please shed some light on this. Your help is much appreciated.
more...
pictures Anaphase, and animal cells
nuke
03-18 11:11 PM
I have to file a loan application which requires me to state if I am a Lawful Permanent resident alien or not; and I am not sure if I am, can somebody please clarify if I am a Lawful Permanent resident alien or not if I have a pening I-485 application and I am working on EAD?
Thanks.
Thanks.
dresses Animal+cell+model+diagram Provides a look at the may when the baggie
KKumarGC
07-27 04:03 PM
Hello Everyone,
My dates are current last month. I added my wife couple weeks back [I couldnt add her earlier as i was not married then]. I got her receipt notices and also fingerprinting. My question is :
is there a way to say that she is linked to my application ?
becuase when I call USCIS, they say: This is separate application and they cant say if it is linked to primary or not.
--> Does receiving receipt notices mean that they accepted her application and linked to primary ?
--> does Fingerprinting appointment means that they accepted her application.
My concern is if my GC is approved and if she is not linked, it would be a problem,I guess.
So, please advise me as to how would i know if she is linked to my application?
please advise
kumar
My dates are current last month. I added my wife couple weeks back [I couldnt add her earlier as i was not married then]. I got her receipt notices and also fingerprinting. My question is :
is there a way to say that she is linked to my application ?
becuase when I call USCIS, they say: This is separate application and they cant say if it is linked to primary or not.
--> Does receiving receipt notices mean that they accepted her application and linked to primary ?
--> does Fingerprinting appointment means that they accepted her application.
My concern is if my GC is approved and if she is not linked, it would be a problem,I guess.
So, please advise me as to how would i know if she is linked to my application?
please advise
kumar
more...
makeup Animal Cell: text, images,
rajaryan
11-30 08:57 PM
Hi,
I got my H1b approved this year. My first name is set to FNU and my full name was added in last name. Now i have got it corrected in my passport as it was wrong in the first place. After my passport was corrected, I was advised to apply for H1B amendment. I have applied for H1B amendment in November. Also I was unable to get my SSN bcos of this name issue and SSN office is demanding to get I797 corrected before issuing the SSN. Now since I am waiting for my SSN and H1B amanedment. I am not paid. I want to know if I am still legal and I am in status? Please let me know the process I should follow if there are any?
This is extremely urgent and any help/advice in thsi regard wil lbe great.
Thanks in Advance,
Raj
I got my H1b approved this year. My first name is set to FNU and my full name was added in last name. Now i have got it corrected in my passport as it was wrong in the first place. After my passport was corrected, I was advised to apply for H1B amendment. I have applied for H1B amendment in November. Also I was unable to get my SSN bcos of this name issue and SSN office is demanding to get I797 corrected before issuing the SSN. Now since I am waiting for my SSN and H1B amanedment. I am not paid. I want to know if I am still legal and I am in status? Please let me know the process I should follow if there are any?
This is extremely urgent and any help/advice in thsi regard wil lbe great.
Thanks in Advance,
Raj
girlfriend printable labeled animal and
milindss
06-25 01:31 PM
Gurus,
In 2007 , I joined a new company and filed my Labour substitution+I140 petition in June 2007. This got approved in November 2007. but my H1B transfer to this company is still not approved. Earlier this year (2008) I went back to my previous company whose H1B is still valid and waited for my old H1B to get approved with no luck.
Now, i wish to start my GC process with this new company, can I retain my old priority date of I140 ? There is absolutely no chance that I will get I-140 approval copy from my old employer, but I have the receipt Number and I know the PD.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you
In 2007 , I joined a new company and filed my Labour substitution+I140 petition in June 2007. This got approved in November 2007. but my H1B transfer to this company is still not approved. Earlier this year (2008) I went back to my previous company whose H1B is still valid and waited for my old H1B to get approved with no luck.
Now, i wish to start my GC process with this new company, can I retain my old priority date of I140 ? There is absolutely no chance that I will get I-140 approval copy from my old employer, but I have the receipt Number and I know the PD.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you
hairstyles simple animal cell with labels
EB2IMMIGRANT
08-03 11:29 AM
Dear attorneys, I have a situation and will appreciate your response on it.
My PERM was recently approved and my company is getting ready to file the I-140. My attorney just noticed that my company at the time of registering the PERM account accidentally listed the FEIN number of their sister company (with similar name) rather than the FEIN number of the company that filed my PERM and on whose payroll I am for the last three years.
Do you think this would be a problem at the I-140 stage since the FEIN number on the PERM is different from the one on the Form I-140 and my paystubs/ W-2? My attorney is telling me that this should not be a problem as it is a typo and he can explain this to the US CIS at the time of filing the I-140 or maybe we can stay quite about it now and will explain it to the US CIS if they have any questions about it.
I will appreciate your response to this.
Thanks!
My PERM was recently approved and my company is getting ready to file the I-140. My attorney just noticed that my company at the time of registering the PERM account accidentally listed the FEIN number of their sister company (with similar name) rather than the FEIN number of the company that filed my PERM and on whose payroll I am for the last three years.
Do you think this would be a problem at the I-140 stage since the FEIN number on the PERM is different from the one on the Form I-140 and my paystubs/ W-2? My attorney is telling me that this should not be a problem as it is a typo and he can explain this to the US CIS at the time of filing the I-140 or maybe we can stay quite about it now and will explain it to the US CIS if they have any questions about it.
I will appreciate your response to this.
Thanks!
GPP
11-10 10:20 PM
i dont like it .. its . too dark?
sampath
04-13 09:34 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4022
No comments:
Post a Comment